Increase in IQ

Over the history of IQ tests we have witnessed an average increase of correct answers on IQ scores that equate to around 30 points.
Interestingly that would make people of today borderline genius by previous tests and make our grandparents borderline retarded. That is obviously not the case but it shows a change in the way we approach problems.

The demand for cognitive tasks in jobs has increased dramatically with the introduction of cheap computer technology and schooling has changed too.
We now accept hypotheticals more readily and use them so frequently that they are common practice. Examples of hypothetical questioning in the past reveal an unwillingness to take hypotheticals seriously and this is a key building block to modern human understanding. We can’t question complex things like morals without positing scenarios which, although maybe unlikely, make us think about the different conditions under which different ethical codes apply for essentially the same moral choice.

Nowhere is the continuation of old ways of thinking more readily apparent to me than in the religious. Without accepting hypotheticals and using reason to apply logic, you are left with a concrete view of the world. One in which things like “because it says in the bible” seem like sound reasons.

We not only need to educate those in religiously influenced societies, but to change the way they are educated to include ideas we take for granted, like hypotheticals.

So.. How would we do this?

-Research by James Flynn PhD et al.

Advertisements

About (V)nemoni)(s

The views and opinions expressed here are purely my own. I am not affiliated with and business or political body. All content is either my own work, items in the public domain, or items used under the terms of Fair Usage for criticism, commentary, or education purposes. (Also; only a fool would take anything posted on here seriously.)
This entry was posted in Atheism and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Increase in IQ

  1. john zande says:

    Good question, and excellent observation. Religion can’t survive unless the mindset is rigid; a windowless cube that capitalises on the lazy of mind and whose few refurnishing’s have only come about to ensure the survival of the cube itself, not the advancement of human knowledge. The genius of science, as method, is that it proceeds from a position of humility and does not – cannot – assume anything to be 100% known, rather best theorised: an unrestricted, open air, temporary platform which is free to be revised and repositioned as new evidence comes to light. The fundamental ineptness of dogma is that it doesn’t understand this concept. It proceeds from a position of certainty whereby adaption to new information – as it comes to light – is seen as an admission to its own falsehood. By its very nature dogma is therefore unmovable. Shifts in its station, even tiny movements are signs of weakness and are as such met with fierce opposition.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s