What you’re arguing against is not evolution.

What you’re arguing against is not evolution, no matter what Ken Ham, Hovind & son, Kirk Cameron, and Ray Comfort have told you.

I’m sometimes unfortunate enough to come across the victims of ignorance saying very uneducated things like:

“What use is half an eye?”
“How would a wing-stub be advantageous?”

Do we find fossils of creatures with half-grown versions of modern morphology?

We find similar features in various stages of adaptation rather than development.

A wing.
A wing with unfused wing fingers.
A feathered arm.
An arm.

What we’re being asked for is fossils following some kind of embryonic development.

A wing.
A shorter wing.
A useless wing-stub.
A stub.

This is why we can’t have Pegasus.
Because what is being asked for is not evidence of evolution but of an ignorant mythical version of evolution perpetuated by those who want to sell you religion.


About (V)nemoni)(s

The views and opinions expressed here are purely my own. I am not affiliated with and business or political body. All content is either my own work, items in the public domain, or items used under the terms of Fair Usage for criticism, commentary, or education purposes. (Also; only a fool would take anything posted on here seriously.)
This entry was posted in Atheism, Evolution and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to What you’re arguing against is not evolution.

  1. iDikko says:

    Haha, they try 😉

  2. john zande says:

    But the crocodoodle is real, isn’t it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s