If you don’t deny what you call “microevolution” then there’s nothing scientific stopping you accepting the Theory of Evolution.

If you accept “microevolution”
then unless you contest both
Time and Genetic Isolation
you accept “macroevolution”

If you think “macroevolution” is species suddenly giving birth to other species then you’re arguing a strawman.

A species must give birth to the same species or the offspring won’t have anything to reproduce with.
i.e. “same kind”

Ring species illustrate how isolation begets speciation. Not suddenly, but as a consequence of accumulation of mutations.

The distant ancestors we share with monkeys were basal to both, not some frankenstein mixture of evolved traits.

Instead of saying “we evolved from monkeys/apes”, it’s more correct to say that Primates have traits of this common ancestor.

Sure we and monkeys have diverged, hence the differences. But this wasn’t an “addition of information”, just accrued mutations.

If you think the transition from sea to land is impossible then take a moment to appreciate the timescale involved.

Why couldn’t creatures like this* evolve either way from here?



About (V)nemoni)(s

The views and opinions expressed here are purely my own. I am not affiliated with and business or political body. All content is either my own work, items in the public domain, or items used under the terms of Fair Usage for criticism, commentary, or education purposes. (Also; only a fool would take anything posted on here seriously.)
This entry was posted in Evolution and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s